First Clostridioides difficile Recurrence Is Highest Following Concomitant Antimicrobial Administration During and Within 30 Days of Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is an epidemic with the strongest risk factor being antibiotic usage. Patients who get CDI frequently require concomitant antibiotics for other indications around the time of their infection. AIMS: To assess the recurrence of CDI (rCDI) in patients receiving concomitant antibiotics at the same time or shortly thereafter treatment of CDI. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records for patients with their first inpatient CDI episode. Patients were grouped into those who didn't receive concomitant antibiotics (noABx), those receiving antibiotics at the same time as treatment of CDI (ABxDURING), those receiving antibiotics within 30-days of completion of CDI therapy (ABxAFTER) and those who received antibiotics both during and after CDI treatment (ABxDuringAfter). Our primary outcome was recurrence within 14-90 days; other outcomes included ICU stay at the time of diagnosis, 30-day ICU transfer, 30-day colectomy, and readmission. RESULTS: 457 patients had CDI during admission (mean age: 66.4 years, 51.9% female). 64.1% were exposed to concomitant antibiotics. Recurrence rates were 4.3%, 6.1%, 13.8% and 19.1%, for noABx, ABxDURING, ABxAFTER and ABxDuringAfter, respectively. Patients with ABxDuringAfter had the highest rates of rCDI when compared to noABx [OR 5.67, 95% CI (2.18-14.72)]. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high rate of utilization of non-CDI antibiotics during or shortly after completing CDI treatment with high rates of recurrence within 90-days. Concomitant antimicrobials alter the opportunity for the microbiota to re-grow and worsens dysbiosis leading to increases in recurrence. Concomitant antimicrobial stewardship remains important in patients being treated for CDI and shortly after treatment.

Idiopathic myointimal hyperplasia of the mesenteric veins: A systematic review and individual patient data regression analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Idiopathic myointimal hyperplasia of the mesenteric veins (IMHMV) is an uncommon cause of colonic ischemia for which surgical treatment is typically curative. We describe clinical, radiologic, and endoscopic findings in IMHMV patients to provide clinicians with a framework for pre-surgical identification of this rare disease. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of seven databases for IMHMV cases and identified additional cases from Yale New Haven Hospital records. To identify features specifically associated with colonic ischemia due to IMHMV, we performed multivariate logistic regression analysis incorporating data from a large cohort of patients with biopsy-proven ischemic colitis. RESULTS: A total of 124 patients with IMHMV were identified (80% male, mean age 53 years, 56% Caucasian). Presenting symptoms were most commonly abdominal pain (86%) and diarrhea (68%). The most affected areas were the sigmoid colon (91%) and rectum (61%). Complications associated with diagnostic delay occurred in 29% of patients. Radiologic vascular abnormalities including non-opacification of the inferior mesenteric vein were observed in 35% of patients. Of the patients, 97% underwent curative surgical resection. Compared with non-IMHMV colonic ischemia, IMHMV was significantly associated with younger age, male sex, absence of rectal bleeding on presentation, rectal involvement, and mucosal ulcerations on endoscopy. CONCLUSION: IMHMV is a rare, underreported cause of colonic ischemia that predominantly involves the rectosigmoid. Our findings suggest younger age, rectal involvement, and absence of rectal bleeding as clinical features to help identify select patients presenting with colonic ischemia as having higher likelihood of IMHMV and therefore consideration of upfront surgical management.

Bad blood: ischemic conditions of the large bowel.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Colon ischemia is the most common form of intestinal ischemic injury and is seen frequently in an elderly population. This disease is usually self-limited, and many causes have been identified. The recent literature has focused on estimates of prognosis, triaging appropriate level of care, and identification of optimal treatments. In this review, we will address our current understanding of colon ischemia including epidemiology, pathophysiology, segmental distribution, presentation, diagnosis, and management. RECENT FINDINGS: Research has recently been focused on factors associated with poor outcome. The medical comorbidities identified include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hepatic cirrhosis, and chronic aspirin use. Serological markers are noninvasive tools that can triage severity. Recent studies have shown procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, D-dimer, and neutrophil counts can help predict those at greatest risk for poor outcome. The timing of colonoscopy relative to symptomatic onset also can help predict severity. Early colonoscopy allows for quicker identification of ischemic stigmata, reducing the chance of misdiagnosis and potentially unnecessary and harmful treatment. The treatment of colon ischemia has classically been conservative with antimicrobials reserved for those with moderate or severe disease. Recent retrospective analysis calls into question the utility of antibiotics in the treatment of colon ischemia, although the data is not convincing enough to advise against antimicrobial treatment in patients with severe and fulminant disease. SUMMARY: It is an exciting time for research focused on colon ischemia. With an improved knowledge, awareness of associated risk factors and predictors of severity, clinicians now have enhanced clinical tools to diagnose and triage patients earlier in the disease. This should help institute prompt and appropriate therapies ultimately improving outcomes.